Legal Opinion

Bentley v. Mountain

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1942No. Civ. 11979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff filed an amended complaint seeking an injunction and damages. The demurrer of defendants to said amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was entered in favor of defendants. Plaintiff' appeals from said judgment.

Plaintiff purported to sue “individually and as a member and as president of Hairdressers and Cosmetology Union No. 582A, affiliated with Journeymen Barbers’ International Union of America, on behalf of herself and all other members of Hairdressers and Cosmetology Union No. 582A.” Pier original complaint consisted of one count. Her amended…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bowman v. WohlkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Adkins v. Model Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Richmond Terminal Corp. v. Parr Terminal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. San Francisco BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Perry v. MeikleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Levy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API