Levy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
Plaintiffs Eugene Levy and Sharon Battle challenge the judgment entered after the trial court sustained defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s (State Farm) demurrer to plaintiffs’ fifth amended complaint without leave to amend, granted State Farm’s motion to strike class action allegations without leave to amend, and granted defendant’s motion to dismiss Battle on the grounds of forum non conveniens. Plaintiffs contend they have properly alleged both individual and class claims arising from State Farm’s practice of omitting certain labor and material…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Ray v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Bentley v. MountainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Thompson v. PurdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rockridge Trust v. Wells Fargo, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- McNeary-Calloway v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Leghorn v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Baker v. National Interstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Baldwin v. AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.