Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Perry v. Meikle

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1951No. Civ. 14637PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff commenced an action naming as defendants Theresa Meikle, Milton D. Sapiro, Twain Michelsen, Joseph E. Perry, Frank J. Perry, A. P. O’Neil and Mary K. Maloney.

The complaint first alleges that the defendants (not naming any of them except in the title) conspired, etc., and through their conspiracy, etc., together, did commit trespass against plaintiff by falsely imprisoning her and causing her to be imprisoned in the county jail of the city and county of San Francisco for a period of six hours on April 29, 1949. The complaint proceeds to allege that the common…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Turpen v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Bowman v. WohlkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. More v. FingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Cooke v. BangsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. People v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Baldwin v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Oppenheimer v. AshburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API