Bowman v. Wohlke
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Sullivan & Sullivan and Theo. J. Roche, and J. C. Bates, for Appellants. Robert H. Countryman, and William P. Hubbard, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This action was instituted on May 4, 1907, by Henry G. Bowman and Margaret Bowman, his wife, against S. A. Wohlke and J. P. Faivre, to recover of defendants ten thousand dollars’ damages alleged to have been suffered by said plaintiffs by reason of a “conspiracy” on the part of defendants and acts done by them in pursuance of such conspiracy, together with fifteen thousand dollars exemplary or punitive damages. The action was tried by the court, without a jury, in May, 1911. The findings of the trial court were in favor of plaintiffs, and judgment was given for them against defendants for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Herron v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Doremus v. HennessyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- More v. FingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mox Incorporated v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.