Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal by the superior court of the county of Los Angeles, after the sustaining of demurrer to his third amended complaint, without leave to amend.
Appellant makes no point on the refusal of permission to amend, and stands on the sufficiency of the complaint.
The action was brought to recover damages arising from an alleged conspiracy between the defendants and one Peter Karales, not joined as a party to the suit, in which it is charged that the parties so conspiring had wrongfully and fraudulently appropriated and destroyed a partnership business…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Bowman v. WohlkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hawthorne v. SiegelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Herron v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Cheney v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Shinn v. Edwin Yee, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.