Legal Opinion
Bou v. Willits
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1923No. Civ. No. 4278PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
This action was one brought by a property owner to enjoin the doing of certain street work in the city of San Bruno, county of San Mateo, under the Improvement Act of 1911. Judgment went for defendant city officials, and the owner appeals.
The facts giving rise to the controversy are as follows: On the twenty-fifth day of May, 1921, the board of trustees of the city of San Bruno passed its resolution of intention to order certain street improvements. The resolution described the work to be performed on “Hensley Avenue, Green Avenue, Easton Avenue, Masson Avenue, Mills Avenue, Huntington Avenue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Behlow v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hawley v. KafitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Federal Construction Co. v. WoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Collins v. City of PhœnixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Gianni v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Forsgren v. SollieUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Walker v. Van ValkenburghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Forsgren v. SollieUtah Supreme Court · 1983