Legal Opinion

Forsgren v. Sollie

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1983No. 18027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This appeal concerns the effect of a condition in a deed. After a trial, the district court held that the deed created a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent, and that the grantor had reacquired the fee by reentry upon condition unfulfilled. We affirm.

The facts are essentially uncontested. In February, 1960, the plaintiff (grantor) conveyed 1.4 acres of unimproved property to James H. Sollie. This property had 73 feet of. frontage on the west side of Washington Boulevard north of Ogden, and abutted land owned by the grantor on the north and south. The consideration was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Upington v. . CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Trustees of Union College v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Papst v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hawley v. KafitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Allen v. Trustees of Great Neck Free ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Forsgren v. SollieUtah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API