Federal Construction Co. v. Wold
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District to compel the execution of a contract for street work. The facts aré stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an application for a writ of mandate directed to the superintendent of streets of the city of Burlingame.
The petitioner is the contractor to whom was awarded the contract for the doing of- certain street and other work in said city under the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730, approved April 7, 1911), and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 1441, approved June 11, 1915). It is sought to obtain the order of this court that the respondent should enter into the contract with the petitioner for the doing of said work. The respondent has declined to sign…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Welch v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Belser v. AllmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Cashin v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Wise v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Stege v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Pasadena v. McAllasterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. San Bernardino High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.