Legal Opinion

Walker v. Van Valkenburgh

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1931No. Docket No. 543PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an original petition filed in this court praying for a writ of mandate commanding respond ent to make and issue an assessment to cover the sum due for work performed and materials furnished in the completion of a contract under the “Improvement Act of 1911”, and attach thereto a diagram of such assessment, together with a warrant for the amount due.

The city of Fresno is a municipal corporation organized as such under a freeholders’ charter. The respondent, C. C. Van Valkenburgh, Jr., was at times material to this proceeding, acting superintendent of streets of city of Fresno.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Gadd v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. In Re East Bay Etc. Water Bonds of 1925California Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Wilcox v. EngebretsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffith Co. v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. V. R. Dennis Construction Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API