Legal Opinion

Forsgren v. Sollie

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1983No. 18027Published

1Opinion of the Court

659 P.2d 1068 (1983)

Ella FORSGREN, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

James H. SOLLIE and Anne Marie Brown Sollie, and Hal A. LaFleur and Marjorie L. Archibald LaFleur aka Marjorie L. Archibald, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 18027.

Supreme Court of Utah.

February 28, 1983.

Robert E. Froerer, Ogden, for defendants and appellants.

Darrell G. Renstrom, Ogden, for plaintiff and respondent.

OAKS, Justice:

This appeal concerns the effect of a condition in a deed. After a trial, the district court held that the deed created a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent, and that the grantor had reacquired the…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Upington v. . CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Trustees of Union College v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Papst v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hawley v. KafitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Allen v. Trustees of Great Neck Free ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API