Hawley v. Kafitz
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. Marion Brooks, and Edward H. Bentley, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
The plaintiffs on November 26, 1901, executed to defendant William Kafitz a grant, bargain, and sale deed of a lot in the Electric Railway Homestead Association Tract in the city of Los Angeles for a money consideration of $375. The deed contained the following provision: ‘1 This deed is given by the parties of the first part, and accepted by the second party, upon the express agreement of the second party to build, or cause to be built, upon the said premises within six (6) months from the date hereof a dwelling-house to cost not less than fifteen hundred ($1,500.00) dollars. Said agreement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graves v. . DeterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Behlow v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Cullen v. SpriggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- City of Portland v. TerwilligerOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Stone v. HoughtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Ballard v. MacCallumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Victoria Hospital Assoc. v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Gramer v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.