State v. Coleman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WinboRNe, C. J.:
The record shows that defendant entered plea in abatement to the denial of which defendant, excepted. This constitutes- assignment of error Number. 1. But apparently this has been abandoned. Since this exception is not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, it is taken as abandoned by him. Rule 28 of the Rules of Practice in Supreme Court, 221 N.C., at page 563.
Upon denial of plea in abatement defendant through counsel interposed a plea of former jeopardy and former acquittal, and in support thereof introduced…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HelmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. . LytleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. OakesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. AbleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.