Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1962No. 74PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The court erred in denying defendant’s motion for non-suit.

~ Three elements are necessary to constitute the offense of forgery: (1) There must be a false making or alteration of some instrument in writing; (2) there must be a fraudulent intent; and (3) the instrument must be apparently capable of effecting a fraud. State v. Dixon, 185 N.C. 727, 117 S.E. 170.

The State’s evidence is sufficient to justify the inference that defendant aided and abetted Jarrett in the execution of the purported check. The check is sufficient in form to constitute a negotiable instrument payable “to order.” G.S.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. KellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. United States v. James H. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API