Legal Opinion

State v. Able

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1971No. 7126SC240PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The appellant’s brief recites:

“Counsel represented the defendant at the trial and has examined the record on appeal. Based upon his examination the undersigned is unable to find reversible error in the record.”

The brief filed on behalf of the Attorney General asserts:

“The State contends that the defendant in the present case had a fair trial conducted in a fair and impartial manner free from prejudicial error.”

Despite the above assertions, the bill of indictment, upon which the prosecution is based, is before us as a part of the record proper, and we are charged with notice of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State v. ShepardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. HackneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. GreerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API