State v. Banks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
In the bill of indictment the State attempts to charge the defendants with burning a building in violation of G.S. 14-62. The bill merely charges the offense in the language of the statute. As to this, the rules are well stated in S. v. Cox, 244 N.C. 57, 59, 92 S.E. 2d 413, 415: “. . . while it is a general rule prevailing in this State that an indictment for a statutory offense is sufficient if the offense be charged in the words of the statute, S. v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373, 11 S.E. 2d 149, the rule is inapplicable where the words of the statute do not in themselves inform the accused of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. . McKeithanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- State v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. PartlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. SellersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BissetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.