Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1976No. 65PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant contends that he was entitled to a continuance as a matter of right when the trial judge rejected his negotiated plea on the ground that the punishment therein provided was too little in view of the pending offenses.

G.S. 15A-1023, in pertinent part, provides:(a) If the parties have agreed upon a plea arrangement pursuant to G.S. 15A-1021 in which the solicitor has agreed to recommend a particular sentence, they must disclose the substance of their agreement to the judge at the time the defendant is called upon to plead.(b) Before accepting a plea pursuant to a plea…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. TyndallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. BlountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. CarrikerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API