State v. Helms
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The bill of indictment is based on G.S. 90-106, which, in pertinent part, provides: “Fraudulent attempts to obtain drugs prohibited. — No person shall obtain or attempt to obtain a narcotic drug, or procure or attempt to procure the administration of a narcotic drug (a) by fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge; or (b) by the forgery or alteration of a prescription or of any written order; or (c) by the concealment of a material fact; or (d) by the use of false name or the giving of a false address.”
The quoted statutory provisions create and define four separate criminal oífenses:…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. SwaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. BissetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.