Legal Opinion

State v. Moffitt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1970No. 7026SC543PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant’s first assignment of error relates to the refusal of the trial judge to quash the bill of indictment on which defendant was tried, it being returned at the 11 May 1970 session of the court. Defendant contends that another bill charging the same offenses was returned against him at the 5 January 1970 session and that no disposition had been made of the former bill. The assignment of error is without merit. In State v. Hastings, 86 N.C. 596 (1882), defendant was tried on a third bill of indictment charging the same offense, and the Supreme Court in upholding the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. State v. . HastingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. State v. CrossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Claude Franklin Moffitt v. Major Fred R. Ross and State of North Carolina, Claude F. Moffitt v. Major Fred R. Ross and State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  4. State v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API