Reynolds v. Canton Insurance Office, Ltd.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered August 7, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on a policy of marine insurance.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The purpose of this action was to recover upon a marine insurance policy for the destruction of the gas boat *426“Arnold” by fire. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendant made a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and also for a new trial. Both of these motions were overruled, and judgment was entered upon the verdict in the sum of $2,114. The defendant appeals.
The facts which are not in dispute, or which the jury had a right to find from the evidence, may be stated as follows : The respondents were the owners…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McElroy v. British America Assur. Co. of TorontoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Beebe v. Ohio Farmers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Mesterman v. Home Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Cushing v. Williamsburg City Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Enos v. HamblenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Discount Shoes, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Ames v. Employers Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Gattavara v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Department of Ecology v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp. of Baltimore v. BilquistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.