Legal Opinion
Ames v. Employers Casualty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 1936No. Civ. 10070PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendant has appealed. After the trial had been completed the plaintiff asked permission to file an amended complaint to conform to the proof. Having prepared that pleading and tendered it, he was given permission to file it. Later the trial court made findings in response to the pleadings then on file. The name of the insured is spelled differently in various places. We use his signature, J. W. Heldoorn, as being correct. Otherwise the findings were:
“FINDINGS OF FACT.
“That it is true that at all times herein mentioned the above-named defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Kister v. Lebanon Mutual Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1889
- McElroy v. British America Assur. Co. of TorontoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Golden Gate Motor Transport Co. v. Great American Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BechardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Mercer Casualty Co. v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- American Surety Co. v. HeiseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- United Pacific Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Harold Meyer, United Pacific Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. C. G. PopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.