Mesterman v. Home Mutual Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, J.
Although there are some cases'holding the contrary, we think the decided weight of authority, as well as the better reasoning, is in favor of the rule that an insurance company is estopped from asserting the invalidity of its policy at the time it was issued for the violation of any of the conditions of such policy, or the application therefor, if, at the time that it was so issued, the fact of such violation was known to the company, or its duly authorized agent. That the Northwest Fire and Marine Insurance Company had knowledge, at the time…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- McElroy v. British America Assur. Co. of TorontoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Staats v. Pioneer InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Day v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.