Legal Opinion

Cushing v. Williamsburg City Fire Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1892No. 530PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Gourt, Spokane Gownty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

Each of the appellant companies was sued for $2,000 upon its policy of insurance, and the pleadings, facts and counsel being the same in each, the cases were tried and are appealed as one.

The complaints show that respondent Nickalls was the contractor with Gushing for the erection of a certain building upon land owned in severalty by him and two other persons for a gross sum of about twenty-six thousand dollars, and was bound to keep the building insured by a builder’s risk. The sixth paragraph alleged knowledge on the part of the insurers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clinton v. . the Hope Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Home Insurance & Banking Co. v. MyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. O'Brien v. Ohio InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Ætna Insurance v. ShryerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Church v. La Fayette Fire Insurance of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gattavara v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Thompson v. Germania Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Reynolds v. Canton Insurance Office, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Horwitz v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Shaw v. Standard Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API