Legal Opinion

National Discount Shoes, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 10, 1981No. 80-1095PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE ROMITI

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff purchased property, obtained an assignment of an insurance policy covering the property from the vendor but failed to obtain the insurance company’s consent to the assignment. After the property was destroyed by fire, the insurer paid the vendor the amount of the mortgage but refused to pay the plaintiff the amount of its loss. On cross-complaint for summary judgment the trial court denied the plaintiff’s claim to recover for its own loss, holding that the insurer’s payment to the mortgage did not waive its defense…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Florsheim v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. Gibraltar Insurance v. VarkalisIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Great American Insurance v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. BrochuIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Redfield v. Continental Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. National Tea Co. v. Commerce & Industry InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Zurich Insurance v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Mitchell Buick & Oldsmobile Sales, Inc. v. National Dealer Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API