Legal Opinion

Beebe v. Ohio Farmers' Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1892PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Livingston. (Person, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action was brought upon two insurance policies. Plaintiff had judgment. Defendant brings error.

The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and the court found substantially that the plaintiff was the owner in fee of a farm situate on sections 8 and 17, in the township of Putnam, in Livingston county, the land being used together as one farm. On the day the policies were issued (June 30, 1890) there was situate upon that portion of the farm on section 8 a dwelling-house occupied by plaintiff as her residence, a barn, storehouse, pigpen, corn house, crib, and wheat house; and upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Insurance v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Cleaver v. Traders' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Tubbs v. Dwelling-House InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Castner v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McElroy v. British America Assur. Co. of TorontoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  2. Coles v. Jefferson Ins. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. German Insurance v. ShaderNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Haapa v. Metropolitan Life-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API