Legal Opinion

Davies, Turner & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 1, 1965No. 69651; protests 318445-K and 58/7738 (Philadelphia)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

This case is before the court by reason of an order granting defendant’s motion for a rehearing. Davies, Turner & Company v. United, States, 50 Cust. Ct. 169, Abstract 67315.

The articles in question are described on the invoices as “CP Brass Duo Insert with Rubber Stopper” and “Kachall Strainers.” Said sink strainers were classified by the collector of customs as articles or wares, not specially provided for, wholly or partly manufactured, composed in chief value of base metal, in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Globe Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Lipman's v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Camarge Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Westbrass Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. D. C. Andrews & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Durst Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API