New York Merchandise Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Chief Judge:
The merchandise involved in these consolidated protests consists of tie racks, coat hangers, towel racks, towel rings, toilet paper holders, soap dishes, and towel bars, imported from Japan. These articles were classified under paragraph 397 of the *675Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, or by Presidential Proclamation No. 8513, 98 Treas. Dec. 51, T.D. 55816, and assessed with duty at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem or 17 per centum ad valorem,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Royal Cathay Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Fred Bronner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amico, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- B. Shackman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Teleflora Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Neco Electrical Products v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.