Legal Opinion

John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 9, 1955No. 59419; protests 226532-K, etc. (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:-

Certain imported metal sink strainers, composed in chief value *293of brass, plated with, chrome, were classified by the collector of customs at the port of Los Angeles as manufactures of metal, not specially provided for, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, and, accordingly, assessed with duty, at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem. Ten importations of this merchandise are herein involved. In the protests filed in connection with each entry, all of which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fensterer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. William Adams, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. S. S. Sarna, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Davies, Tuner & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API