Legal Opinion

Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 29, 1968No. C.D. 3459PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beckwortu, Judge:

The merchandise, described on the invoice as #2100X, 4%" Duo Strainers Knob Type (Full Size), was imported from Japan and entered at the port of Philadelphia on July 16,1963. It was assessed with duty at 19 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the 'General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, as articles, not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of brass. It is claimed that the merchandise should not be classified as an entirety;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Silvine Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Westbrass Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Hancock Gross, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  4. Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Lipman's v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API