Camarge Trading Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrence, Judge:
A commodity described in the consular invoice as “Chrome plated Fitall Basket Insert” was classified by the collector of customs as an article in chief value of metal in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiff relies upon the claim in its protest that the articles are household or kitchen utensils and should be classified, accordingly, in paragraph 339 of said act (19 U. S. C.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Davies, Tuner & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962