Legal Opinion

Davies v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 13, 1962No. 67184; protests 318445-K and 58/7738 (Philadelphia)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

The above two protests were consolidated for trial. They relate to three types of sink or basin strainers, represented by plaintiff’s exhibits 1, 2, and 3.

The importations were classified as articles in chief value of base metal, not specially provided for, in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 21 per centum ad valorem.

It is the claim of plaintiff that said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Globe Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Camarge Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Turner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Durst Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API