State v. Ray
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*597JONES, J.
Defendant was charged by complaint with the crime of harassment under ORS 166.065(1)(e). He filed a written demurrer to the complaint on the grounds that the statute was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad on its face. The district judge overruled the demurrer and defendant was convicted in a stipulated facts trial to the court. The Court of Appeals reversed the district court, citing State v. Henry, 78 Or App 392, 717 P2d 189 (1986), which invalidated a prohibition against alleged “obscene” publications on vagueness grounds.
We agree with the Court of Appeals that this telephone…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. BlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BlairOregon Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Portland v. TidymanOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Hillsboro v. PurcellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. Hirsch/FriendOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BabsonOregon Supreme Court · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.