Legal Opinion

State v. Ray

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1987No. CC B66-078; CA A34281; SC S32986PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*597JONES, J.

Defendant was charged by complaint with the crime of harassment under ORS 166.065(1)(e). He filed a written demurrer to the complaint on the grounds that the statute was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad on its face. The district judge overruled the demurrer and defendant was convicted in a stipulated facts trial to the court. The Court of Appeals reversed the district court, citing State v. Henry, 78 Or App 392, 717 P2d 189 (1986), which invalidated a prohibition against alleged “obscene” publications on vagueness grounds.

We agree with the Court of Appeals that this telephone…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. BlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. BlairOregon Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. TidymanOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. City of Hillsboro v. PurcellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. Hirsch/FriendOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. BabsonOregon Supreme Court · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API