Legal Opinion
State v. Blair
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1979No. TC B46-293, CA 12166, SC 26079PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.
Defendant was charged with committing the crime of "harassment” by means of telephone calls to named persons in a manner both intended and "likely to cause annoyance and alarm,” contrary to ORS 166.065(1)(c). The district court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the complaint on the ground that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. On the state’s appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed, 38 Or App 90, 588 P2d 1132 (1979), citing its prior holding in State v. Larsen, 37 Or App 425, 588 P2d 41 (1978), in which it had undertaken to save the validity of the statute by giving it a limiting…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Seattle v. HuffWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.