Legal Opinion

City of Hillsboro v. Purcell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1988No. TC 85-0424; CA A41670; TC 85-0425; CA A41671; SC S34643PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

We must decide whether Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution, providing that “[n]o law shall be passed restraining the free expression of opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write, or print freely on any subject whatever * * prohibits a Hillsboro city ordinance which makes criminal “the practice of persons going in and upon private property or calling at residences * * * not having been requested or invited so to do * * * for the purpose of soliciting orders for the sale of goods, wares, merchandise and/or for the purpose of disposing of and/or peddling or hawking the same…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lloyd Corporation v. WhiffenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. City of Eugene v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. Hirsch/FriendOregon Supreme Court · 2005

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API