City of Hillsboro v. Purcell
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
We must decide whether Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution, providing that “[n]o law shall be passed restraining the free expression of opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write, or print freely on any subject whatever * * prohibits a Hillsboro city ordinance which makes criminal “the practice of persons going in and upon private property or calling at residences * * * not having been requested or invited so to do * * * for the purpose of soliciting orders for the sale of goods, wares, merchandise and/or for the purpose of disposing of and/or peddling or hawking the same…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Lloyd Corporation v. WhiffenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Eugene v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Hirsch/FriendOregon Supreme Court · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.