Legal Opinion

State v. Blocker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1981No. CA 15586, SC 27255PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

Defendant was charged, tried and convicted of possessing a “billy” in violation of ORS 166.510(1):

“(1) Except as provided in ORS 166.515 or 166.520, any person who manufactures, causes to be manufactured, sells, keeps for sale, offers, gives, loans, carries or possesses an instrument or weapon having a blade which projects or swings into position by force of a spring or other device and commonly known as a switch-blade knife or an instrument or weapon commonly known as a blackjack, slung shot, billy, sandclub, sandbag, sap glove or metal knuckles, or who carries a dirk, dagger or stiletto…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. DelgadoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Benjamin v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. State v. GarciasOregon Supreme Court · 1984

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API