Legal Opinion
State v. Kipf
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1990No. 88-974PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, Robert L. Kipf, was convicted in the county court of intimidation by telephone call, a Class III misdemeanor, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1310(l)(b) (Reissue 1985), which conviction was affirmed by the district court. In his appeal to this court, Kipf assigns 18 errors, which can be summarized as claiming that the district court erred by failing to find the county judge erred (1) in failing to sustain Kipf’s motion to quash the complaint on the ground the subject statute is unconstitutional and by subsequently mischarging the jury in reliance upon the…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- City of Bellevue v. LorangWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Bellevue v. LorangWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Application A-16642Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RichardsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.