Legal Opinion
State v. Moyle
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 1985No. DA 240844-8208; CA A28286; SC S30468PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*693CARSON, J.
At issue in this case is the constitutionality of the statute that prohibits harassment, defined as alarming another person by conveying a telephonic or written threat to inflict serious physical injury or commit a felony. ORS 166.065(1) (d) provides:
“A person commits the crime of harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, the actor:
U* * * * *
“Subjects another to alarm by conveying a telephonic or written threat to inflict serious physical injury on that person or to commit a felony involving the person or property of that person or any member of that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Portland v. TidymanOregon Supreme Court · 1988
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.