Legal Opinion

State v. Moyle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1985No. DA 240844-8208; CA A28286; SC S30468PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*693CARSON, J.

At issue in this case is the constitutionality of the statute that prohibits harassment, defined as alarming another person by conveying a telephonic or written threat to inflict serious physical injury or commit a felony. ORS 166.065(1) (d) provides:

“A person commits the crime of harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, the actor:

U* * * * *

“Subjects another to alarm by conveying a telephonic or written threat to inflict serious physical injury on that person or to commit a felony involving the person or property of that person or any member of that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. City of Portland v. TidymanOregon Supreme Court · 1988

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API