State v. Hirsch/Friend
Oregon Supreme Court
(Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
In these two criminal cases, consolidated for purposes of review, the trial court convicted each defendant of the crime of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270(1). Defendants contend that ORS 166.270(1) is facially unconstitutional because that statute infringes on the right to bear arms guaranteed under Article I, section 27, of the Oregon Constitution. The Court of Appeals disagreed with that contention and, in each case, affirmed the trial court’s decisions to overrule defendants’ demurrers. State v. Hirsch, 177 Or App 441, 34 P3d 1209 (2001); State v. Friend, 178 Or App 157, 35…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Robertson v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. GreenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- MacPherson v. Department of Administrative ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. RainoldiOregon Supreme Court · 2011
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.