Legal Opinion

Boulenger v. Morison

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1928No. Docket No. 3373PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

-This is an appeal by plaintiff A. E. Boulenger from a judgment rendered against him in an action wherein he sought to enforce specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate.

The facts are briefly these: On October 8, 1923, Donald Morison and his wife, Catherine Elizabeth Morison, owned certain real estate in the city of Los Angeles, which was community property. “Terry & Company" were real estate brokers and are the successors of another real estate firm known as “Wheeler & Terry," and were operating in Los Angeles. The plaintiff A. E. Boulenger is…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Cushing v. LeviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Helbing v. HelbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Williams v. RushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Evarts v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API