Prince v. Lamb
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This is an appeal from a judgment following an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. The action is against the defendant Lamb. Smith Vas made a'defendant because be was out of the United States, and his consent to become a plaintiff could not be obtained.
The substance of the complaint, necessary to'be stated, is as follows: That in the year 1896, in the city of Los Angeles, the plaintiffs and defendant Smith agreed to and did furnish said defendant Lamb with fifty dollars (ten dollars each) “as a grubstake to enable him to go to Alaska, or the Northwest…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Bruck v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Bohall v. DillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Vidal v. South American Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.