Legal Opinion

Katemis v. Westerlind

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1953No. Civ. 19721PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of nonsuit in an action for specific performance and damages.

The facts adduced below show that plaintiffs, who are husband and wife and long-time residents of Chicago, visited Los Angeles with the intention of making a capital investment there. Through the offices of Mr. Solon C. Solaris, a real estate salesman employed by the Atomic Realty Company and who served as plaintiffs’ representative or agent in the transaction subsequently ensuing, plaintiffs were advised on February 23, 1952, of the availability for purchase of several income units,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Henck v. Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Kerr v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Rubin v. FuchsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. v. Foundation Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API