Legal Opinion

Evarts v. Johnston

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1949No. L. A. 20591PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

E. F. Evarts and his wife agreed to purchase a ranch owned by Samuel W. and Sarah Johnston. The Johnstons canceled an escrow agreement made by the parties for the purpose of closing the transaction, and were then sued for specific performance of the contract. The appeal of the Evarts from an adverse judgment presents for decision only the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings.

The sale price of the property as fixed by the contract was $25,000 with a first payment of $4,000. By the agreement, the Johnstons were to accept certain property, subject to an existing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cockrill v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Boulenger v. MorisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Realmuto v. GagnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Nash v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Sidwell v. the New Mine Sapphire SyndicateMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Sackett v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API