Legal Opinion

Cushing v. Levi

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1931No. Docket No. 903PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, J., pro tern.

This is a suit for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate or for damages in case specific performance cannot be had. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendants appeal.

On November 21, 1927, the plaintiff and the defendants entered into an agreement, the terms of which, so far as important here, are as follows:

“For and in consideration of ten ($10) dollars, and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, we hereby give to Richard C. Cushing of Los Angeles, California, an exclusive right to buy the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Carr v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Miller v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bird v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Rader v. ThrasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. House v. LalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Burrow v. TimmsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Seeburg v. El Royale Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API