Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hissem v. Guran

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1925No. 18771PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This cause involves the interpretation of the Freeman-Collister Motor Transportation Act, hut is not a review of any order of the Public Utilities Commission. The cause originated in the court of common pleas of Summit county, Ohio, at the suit of Hissem, operating a motor transportation company under a certificate of public convenience issued by the Public Utilities Commission, granting’ him the exclusive right to conduct and operate his business as a motor transportation company over a regular route between fixed termini in Summit county, Ohio, seeking to enjoin Curan and Myers from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Southern Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. McIntyre v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Holmes v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Weaver v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Dairymen's Co-Operative Sales Assn. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API