Legal Opinion

Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 11, 1923No. 739PublishedCited by 304 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

The necessary postulate of the Industrial Court Act is that the State, representing the people, is so much interested in their peace, health and comfort that it may compel those engaged in the manufacture of food, and clothing, and the production of fuel, whether owners or workers, to continue in their business and employment on terms fixed by an agency of the State if they can not agree. Under the construction adopted by the State Supreme Court the act gives the Industrial Court authority to permit the owner or employer to go out of the business, if he shows that he can only continue on the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by304 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API