Legal Opinion

Southern Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1924No. 18019PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This is an error proceeding from tbe Public Utilities Commission, which is closely related to and in large measure based upon, a former error proceeding prosecuted to this court from the Utilities Commission, being cause No. 17558, Ohio Mining Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 106 Ohio St., 138, 140 N. E., 143. It was sought in that ease, as it is in the present case, to declare the property of the Southern Ohio Power Company as being dedicated to. public utility service, and to compel that company to file a schedule of its rates and charges. The pertinent and salient fact before the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ohio Mining Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of St. Marys v. Auglaize County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Coastal States Gas Transmission v. PSCSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Hissem v. GuranOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Marano v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Rural Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1942

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API