Legal Opinion
Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Duke
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 12, 1925No. 283PublishedCited by 189 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
This is an appeal under § 266, Judicial Code, from an order granting an interlocutory injunction restraining appellants from enforcing against appellee, plaintiff below, Act No. 209, Public Acts of 1923 of Michigan. The act provides that no person shall engage or continue in the business of transporting persons or propérty by motor vehicle for hire upon the public highways of the State over fixed routes or between fixed termini, unless he shall have obtained from the Michigan Public Utilities Commission a permit so to do. The permit shall be issued in accordance with the public convenience…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sioux Remedy Co. v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by189 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.