Holmes v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.
Review to annul a decision and order of the respondent Railroad Commission. The decision sought 'to be reviewed was the outcome of a proceeding before the Commission wherein the respondents Highway Transport Company and S. B. McLenegan. & Son, both “certificated” common carriers of freight by motor-truck between San Francisco and San Jose and intermediate points, filed complaint alleging that the petitioners herein were operating motor-trucks without having obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity to do so for the transportation of freight for hire over the public highways…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- Hissem v. GuranOhio Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Application of Dakota Transp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Entremont v. WhitsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Suddreth v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.