Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Public Util. Comm'n of Ohio
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 10, 1933No. 395PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Brandéis
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Bradley applied to the Public Utilities Commission pf Ohio for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate by motor as a (common carrier of property over' State Route No. 20, extending from Cleveland, Ohio, to the Ohio-Michigan line, with Flint, Michigan, as filial destination. The New York Central Railroad and the Pennsylvania Railroad, opposing, moved that the application be dismissed on the ground of the present congested condition of that highway. Upon a full hearing, the Commission found “ that said State Route No.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.