Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Hicks

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1979No. 11330PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

The Jacksons commenced this action to have the district court declare that they had acquired a prescriptive easement over a twenty-foot strip of land owned by Henry and Marjorie Hicks. Contrary to their claims, the court found that their use of the strip of land was permissive, rather than hostile and adverse. Consequently, judgment was entered for the Hickses. This appeal challenges the propriety of that decision.

The Hickses and Jacksons own adjoining property as reflected on the diagram below. The twenty-foot strip of land between lots 17 and 19 connects the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Stix v. La RueNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Richardson v. BrennanNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Turrillas v. QuiliciNevada Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Dean v. PollardNevada Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of Manchester v. Augusta Country ClubSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. Melendez v. HintzIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Anderson v. FeltenNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Wilfon v. Cyril Hampel 1985 TrustNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Anderson v. FeltenNevada Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API