Stix v. La Rue
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
Mr. and Mrs. La Rue commenced an action to enjoin Mrs. Stix from interfering with their use of a claimed right of way over the Stix ranch, herein referred to as the' Quail Canyon ranch. After trial, the lower court entered judgment for Mr. and Mrs. La Rue, declaring a right of way over the Quail Canyon ranch to be owned by them as an appurtenance to their ranch, herein referred to as the Monte Cristo ranch, granting them the right to use such way for ingress to and egress from the Monte Cristo ranch, and permanently enjoining Mrs. Stix and her agents from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914
- Chollar-Potosi Mining Co. v. KennedyNevada Supreme Court · 1867
- Turrillas v. QuiliciNevada Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jordan v. BaileyNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Jackson v. HicksNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Richardson v. BrennanNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- Anderson v. FeltenNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Brooks v. JensenNevada Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.